skip to Main Content
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
Open Mobile Menu

On Remand, Federal Circuit Rejects Wi-Fi One’s Time-Bar Arguments

  • April 23, 2018
  • Robert Gravois

The Federal Circuit holds that the Board did not err in deciding several issues relating to whether a party was time-barred from petitioning for IPR under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). As discussed in an earlier post, the Federal Circuit in Wi-Fi…

Read More→

PTAB Terminates Instituted IPRs After Petitioner Becomes Estopped from Challenging the Claims

  • February 4, 2018
  • Robert Gravois

The PTAB terminated two instituted IPRs because the petitioner became estopped from challenging the claims as a result of final written decisions issuing in other IPRs. The estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 315(e) attach to an IPR petitioner once…

Read More→
About the Author

Robert Gravois is a partner at Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP with extensive experience in patent office proceedings, including inter partes review (IPR), covered business method (CBM), reexamination, and interference proceedings. He has represented clients in proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in federal district courts throughout the country, and at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Learn more.

About the Firm

Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP is a premier intellectual property law firm headquartered in Atlanta with approximately 40 attorneys and patent agents serving clients all over the world. The firm offers services in all areas in intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights. All of Thomas | Horstemeyer’s attorneys and patent agents have technical backgrounds, with many holding advanced masters and doctorate degrees in their respective technical fields. Learn more.

Categories
  • 35 U.S.C. 315(b) (1)
  • 35 USC 315(e) (1)
  • 35 USC 325(d) (4)
  • Additional Discovery (2)
  • Claim Construction (5)
  • Collateral Estoppel (1)
  • En banc (1)
  • Estoppel (2)
  • Evidence (1)
  • Expanded Panel (1)
  • Federal Circuit (4)
  • Fees (1)
  • Informative Opinion (2)
  • Motion to Amend (1)
  • Motion to Exclude (1)
  • Printed Publication (1)
  • Prior Art (3)
  • Proposed Rule (2)
  • Sanctions (1)
  • Scope of Reply (1)
  • Sovereign Immunity (2)
  • Supreme Court (2)
  • Time Bar (2)
  • Uncategorized (2)
© 2017-2018 Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer
Back To Top