skip to Main Content
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Search
Open Mobile Menu

Two IPR Decisions Involving 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) Designated Informative

  • March 26, 2018
  • Robert Gravois

On March 21, 2018, the Board designated as "informative decisions" two PTAB decisions in which review was denied under 35 U.S.C. § 325(d). According to the Board's standard operating procedures, an informative decision provides guidance on (1) Board norms on…

Read More→

PTAB Designates Three Decisions Regarding 35 U.S.C. § 325(d) as Informative Opinions

  • December 9, 2017
  • Robert Gravois

The Board has designated three decisions as "informative" to provide guidance to parties as to how it may deny IPR petitions that rely on prior art or arguments that have already been considered by the Patent Office. When determining whether…

Read More→
About the Author

Robert Gravois is a partner at Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP with extensive experience in patent office proceedings, including inter partes review (IPR), covered business method (CBM), reexamination, and interference proceedings. He has represented clients in proceedings at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in federal district courts throughout the country, and at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Learn more.

About the Firm

Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP is a premier intellectual property law firm headquartered in Atlanta with approximately 40 attorneys and patent agents serving clients all over the world. The firm offers services in all areas in intellectual property, including patents, trademarks, trade secrets, and copyrights. All of Thomas | Horstemeyer’s attorneys and patent agents have technical backgrounds, with many holding advanced masters and doctorate degrees in their respective technical fields. Learn more.

Categories
  • 35 U.S.C. 315(b) (1)
  • 35 USC 315(e) (1)
  • 35 USC 325(d) (4)
  • Additional Discovery (2)
  • Claim Construction (5)
  • Collateral Estoppel (1)
  • En banc (1)
  • Estoppel (2)
  • Evidence (1)
  • Expanded Panel (1)
  • Federal Circuit (4)
  • Fees (1)
  • Informative Opinion (2)
  • Motion to Amend (1)
  • Motion to Exclude (1)
  • Printed Publication (1)
  • Prior Art (3)
  • Proposed Rule (2)
  • Sanctions (1)
  • Scope of Reply (1)
  • Sovereign Immunity (2)
  • Supreme Court (2)
  • Time Bar (2)
  • Uncategorized (2)
© 2017-2018 Thomas | Horstemeyer LLP. All rights reserved. | Disclaimer
Back To Top